Post by account_disabled on Mar 16, 2024 10:20:18 GMT
The Problem is That the a Security Policy That Goes Hand in Hand With Its Peace Policy. The Disarticulation Between the Ministry of Defense and the Office of the Commissioner for Peace is Patent. The Extreme Generosity That Has Existed Towards the Groups Has Not Been Accompanied by the Design and Execution of a Muchneeded Deterrence Strategy Which Generates the Incentives to Make Them Want to Negotiate Peace or Submission to Justice. Total Peace Has Been Broad in Handing Out Carrots but No Matter How Unpopular It May Seem in the Context of a Progressive Government the Control of Violent Actors in Colombia Also Requires.
A Cudgel for Realistic Negotiations to Take Place. Even People OPT IN List Who Have Historically Been Critical of the Military Route Have Recognized It According to the Senator of the Historical Pact Ivn Cepeda Who Has Always Preferred the Negotiated Route Unfortunately We Have to Resort to the Force Operations of the Public Force. That is the Least Desired Path Because That Path Involves Confrontations and Actions That Regularly Mean More Violence in the Territories.. But if This is Not Done What Remains Are Armed Actors Who Are Strengthened and Less and Less Concerned About What the State Can Do to Contain Them. Since His Election as President Petro Indicated That He Would Prioritize the Notion of Human Security and the Protection of the Lives of the Civilian Population. However Within the Public Force There is No.
Clarity About What This Means Even Less So When It Comes to Landing the Concept in Their Strategic and Operational Plans. The Minister of Defense Appears Little in the Media Something Rare in the Colombian Context and in Some Sectors There is the Impression That His Lack of Experience on the Subject is Taking Its Toll on Him. In a Country Like Colombia It is Serious That After Eight Months of Installing the Government There Are No Clear and Explicit Guidelines on What the Security Strategy Will Be That Will Allow Progress in Achieving Peace. It is Worth Mentioning Two Examples That Show the Problems of Disarticulation Between the Peace and Security Agendas.
A Cudgel for Realistic Negotiations to Take Place. Even People OPT IN List Who Have Historically Been Critical of the Military Route Have Recognized It According to the Senator of the Historical Pact Ivn Cepeda Who Has Always Preferred the Negotiated Route Unfortunately We Have to Resort to the Force Operations of the Public Force. That is the Least Desired Path Because That Path Involves Confrontations and Actions That Regularly Mean More Violence in the Territories.. But if This is Not Done What Remains Are Armed Actors Who Are Strengthened and Less and Less Concerned About What the State Can Do to Contain Them. Since His Election as President Petro Indicated That He Would Prioritize the Notion of Human Security and the Protection of the Lives of the Civilian Population. However Within the Public Force There is No.
Clarity About What This Means Even Less So When It Comes to Landing the Concept in Their Strategic and Operational Plans. The Minister of Defense Appears Little in the Media Something Rare in the Colombian Context and in Some Sectors There is the Impression That His Lack of Experience on the Subject is Taking Its Toll on Him. In a Country Like Colombia It is Serious That After Eight Months of Installing the Government There Are No Clear and Explicit Guidelines on What the Security Strategy Will Be That Will Allow Progress in Achieving Peace. It is Worth Mentioning Two Examples That Show the Problems of Disarticulation Between the Peace and Security Agendas.
